Review/Inspection/Audits Measurements

  1. Andersson, C., Thelin, T., Runeson, P., and Dzamashvili, N. (2003). An experimental evaluation of inspection and testing for detection of design faults. In ISESE ’03: Proceedings of the 2003 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, page 174, Washington, DC, USA. IEEE Computer Society
  2. Aurum, A., Petersson, H., and Wohlin, C. (2002). State-of-the-art: software inspections after 25 years. Softw. Test., Verif. Reliab., 12(3):133–154.
  3. Bianchi, A.; Lanubile, F.; Vissagio, G.: A Controlled Experiment to Assess the Effectiveness of Inspection Meetings. Pro. of the Seventh International Software Metrics Symposium METRICS 2001, April 2001, London, pp. 42-50
  4. Biffl, S.: Using Inspection Data for Defect Estimation. IEEE Software, November/December 2000, pp. 36-43
  5. Biffl, S.; Gutjahr, W.; Influence of Team Size and Defect Detection Technique on Inspection Effectiveness. Pro. of the Seventh International Software Metrics Symposium METRICS 2001, April 2001, London, pp. 63-77
  6. Chatzigeorgiou, A. and Antoniadis, G. (2003). Efficient management of inspections in software development projects. Information & Software Technology, 45(10):671–680.
  7. Ciolkowski, M.; Biffl, S.; Rombach, D.: ISERN: A Distributed Experiment - Ein verteiltes Inspektionsexperiment. In: Dumke/Rombach: Software-Messung und Bewertung, Deutscher Universitätsverlag, Wiesbaden, Germany, 2002, pp. 145-159
  8. Ciolkowski, M.; Laitenberger, O.; Biffl, S.: Software Reviews: The State of the Practice. IEEE Software, Nov/Dec 2003, pp. 46-51
  9. Ciolkowski, M., Laitenberger, O., Rombach, D., Shull, F., and Perry, D. (2002). Software inspections, reviews & walkthroughs. In ICSE ’02: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 641–642, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
  10. Ebenau, R. G. and Strauss, S. H. (1994). Software inspection process. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY, USA.
  11. Eickelmann, N. S., Ruffolo, F., Baik, J., and Anant, A. (2002). An empirical study of modifying the Fagan inspection process and the resulting main effects and interaction effects among defects found, effort required, rate of preparation and inspection, number of team members and product. In SEW’02: Proceedings of the 27th Annual NASA Goddard Software Engineering Workshop, page 58, Washington, DC, USA. IEEE Computer Society.
  12. Freimut, B.; Klein, B.; Laitenberger, O.; Ruhe, G.: Measurable Software Quality Improvement through Innovative Software Inspection Technologies at Allianz Life Assurance. Proc. of the ESCOM-SCOPE 2000, April 2000, Munich, Germany, Shaker Publ., pp. 345-353
  13. Freimut, B.; Laitenberger, O.; Biffl. S.: Investigating the Impact of Reading Techniques on the Accuracy of Different Defect Content Estimation Techniques. Pro. of the Seventh International Software Metrics Symposium METRICS 2001, April 2001, London, pp. 51-62
  14. Freimut, B. and Vollei, F.: Determining inspection cost effectiveness by combining project data and expert opinion. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng.,2005, 31(12):1074–1092
  15. Hollocker , C.P.: Software Reviews and Audits Handbook. John Wiley & Sons, 1990
  16. Kunz, M.; Dumke, R.R.: Metrikenbasierter Reviewprozess in der agilen Softwareentwicklung. In: G. Büren; R.R. Dumke; J. Münch: MetriKon 2011 - Praxis der Software-Messung. Tagungsband des DASMA Software Merik Kongresses, 17.-18. November 2011, Kaiserslautern, Shaker Verlag Aachen, S. 151-158
  17. Kusumoto, S.; Matsumoto, K.; Kikuno, T.: Approaches to Improving Effectiveness of Review Activities in Technical Review Process. Proceedings of the International Software Quality Exchange, San Francisco, March 10-11, 1992
  18. Laitenberger, O.; Leszak, M.; Stoll, D.; Emam, K. E.: Quantitative Modeling of Software Reviews in an Industrial Setting. Proc. of the METRICS'99, Boca Raton, Florida, November 1999, pp. 312-322
  19. Oman, P.W.: A case study in SQA audits. Software Quality Journal, 2(1993)1, pp. 13-28
  20. Parnas, D. L.; Lawford, M.: The Role of Inspection in Software Quality Assurance. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 29(2003)8, pp. 674-676
  21. Paton, K.: Cost-Effectiveness of Manual Code Inspection. In: Dumke/Abran: Current Trends in Software Measurement, Shaker Publ., Aachen, Germany, 2001, pp. 192-199
  22. Singh, Y.; Bhatia, P.: Module Weakness: A New Measure. Software Engineering Notes, 23(1998)5, p. 81
  23. Tervonen, I.: Support for Quality-Based Design and Inspection. IEEE Software, January 1996, pp. 44-54
  24. Veenendahl, E. van; Zwan, M. van der: GQM based Inspection. Proc. of the ESCOM-SCOPE 2000, April 2000, Munich, Germany, Shaker Publ., pp. 367-372
  25. Wohlin, C.; Runeson, P.; Brantestam, J.: An Experimental Evaluation of Capture-Recapture in Software Inspections. Sofwtare Testing, Verification & Reliability, 5(1995)4, pp. 213-232