Process Improvement Measurements

  1. Ahern, D. M.; Clouse, A.; Turner, R.: CMMI Distilled - A Practical Introduction to Integrated Process Improvement. Addison-Wesley, 2001
  2. Ambriola, V.; Ciancarini, P.; Corradini, A.; DeFrancesco, N.: Towards Innovative Software Engineering Environments. The Journal of Systems and Software, 14(1991) pp. 17-29
  3. Armour, P. G.: The Laws of Software Process – A New Model for the Production and Management of Software. CRC Press, 2004
  4. Arthur, L.J.: Rapid Evolutionary Development John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1992
  5. Azouz, S. and A. Abran: A proposed Measurement Role in the Rational Unified Process and its Implementation with ISO 19761: COSMIC-FFP, In Proceedings of Software Measurement European Forum 2004 (SMEF2004), ed. R. Meli et al., 403-415. Rome, Italy: DPO Publ
  6. Basili, V. et al.: SEL's Software Process-Improvement Program. IEEE Software, November 1995, pp. 83-87
  7. Basili, V.R.; Reiter, R.W.: An Investigation of Human Factors in Software Development. Second Edition to Selected Reprints in Software, IEEE Computer Society, Spring, 1982, pp. 182-199
  8. Basili, V.R.; Rombach, H.D.: Tailoring the Software Process to Project Goals and Environments. Proceedings of the 9th International Confenrence on Software Engineering, Monterey, March 30 - April 2, 1987, pp. 345-357
  9. Basili, V.; Rombach, D.: The TAME Project: Towards Improvement-Oriented Software Ingineering. IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering, 14(1988)6, S. 758-773
  10. Basili, V.R.; Selby, R.W.: Calculation and Use of an Environment's Charactersitics Software Metric Set. Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Software Engineering, London, August 1985, pp. 386-388
  11. Beck, K.: extreme Programming - Embrace Change. Addison-Wesley Publ., 2000
  12. Beck, K. (2002). Test Driven Development: By Example. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, USA.
  13. Ben-Mechanem, M.; Marliss, G. S.: Inventorying Information Technology Systems: Supporting the "Paradigm of Change". IEEE Software, September/October 2004, pp. 34-43
  14. Birk, A.; Rombach, D.: A Practical Approach to Continuous Improvement in Software Engineering. in: Wieczorek/Meyerhoff: Software Quality, Springer Publ. 2001, pp. 34-45
  15. Blohm, M.; Nordby, E. J.; Brunstrom, A.: An Experimental Evaluation of Programming by Contract. Proc. of the ECBS 2002, Lund, Sweden, 8-11 April 2002, pp. 118-127
  16. Bobkowska, A.: Quantitative and qualitative methods in process improvement and product quality assessment. Proc. of the ESCOM 2001, April 2001, London, pp. 347-356
  17. Boehm, B.W.: Anchoring the Software Process. IEEE Software, July 1996, pp. 73-82
  18. Boehm, B.W.: A Spiral Model of Software Development and Enhancement. IEEE Cumputer, May 1988, pp. 61-72
  19. Boehm, B.W.: Software Engineering Economics. Prentice Hall, 1981
  20. Briand, L.C.; Basili, V.R.; Thomas, W.M.: A Pattern Recognition Approach for Software Engineering Data Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 18(1992)11, pp. 931-942
  21. Brooks, F.P.: The Mythical Man-Month - Essays on Software Engineering . Addison-Wesley Publ., 1975
  22. Büren, G.: Softwaregrößenmaße im Kontext des CMMI Tagungsband des DASMA Software Metrik Kongresses (MetriKon 2003), November 10-11, 2003, Ulm, Shaker Publ., Aachen, pp. 89-98
  23. Buglione, L., Abran, A.: Assessment of measurement indicators in SPI frameworks Proc. of the 13th International Workshop on Software Measurement, September 23-25, 2003, Montreal, Shaker Publ., Aachen, pp. 287-310
  24. Buglione, L.; Abran, A.: Creativity and Innovation in SPI: An Exploratory Paper on their Measurement? In: Dumke/Abran: Current Trends in Software Measurement, Shaker Publ., Aachen, Germany, 2001, pp. 112-126
  25. Cangussu, J. W. (2003). A stochastic control model of the software test process. In ProSim’03: Proceedings of the Workshop on Software Process Simulation Modeling.
  26. Card, D.N.; Glass, R. L.: Measuring Software Design Quality. Prentice-Hall Inc., 1990
  27. Card, D.; Zubrow, D.: Benchmarking Software Organizations. IEEE Software, September/October 2001, pp. 16-17
  28. Cardoso, A.I.; Crespo, R.G.: Complexity metrics for control of monotonic software processes. Proc. of the FESMA'98, Antwerp, Belgium, May 6-8, 1998, pp. 615-620
  29. Casallas, R.; Ocampo, A.; Soto, M.: An Implementation of the PSP in an Industrial Context: A Case Study. Proc. of the FESMA'99, Amsterdam, Netherlands, October 1999, pp. 447-455
  30. Clark, B. K.: Quantifying the Effects of Process Improvement on Effort. IEEE Software, November/December 2000, pp. 65-70
  31. Cole, R. J. and Woods, D.: Measurement Through the Software Lifecycle: A Comperative Case Study. 10th Annual Conference on Application of Software Metrics and Quality Assurance in Industry, September 29-October 1, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 199
  32. Costello, R.; Liu, D.: Metrics for Software and Systems Requirements Engineering for Large System Acquisition and Development . Proceedings of the Annual Oregon Workshop on Software Metrics, April 10-12, 1994, Silver Falls, Oregon
  33. Craigmyle, M.; Fletcher, I.: Improving IT effectiveness through software process assessment. Software Quality Journal, 2(1993)4, pp. 257-264
  34. Daneva, M.; Terzieva, R.: Effective Software Improvement by Benchmarking. Proc. of the Conference on Software Measurement and Management, February 5-9, Rome, 1996, (14 p.)
  35. Dao, M.; Huchard, M.; Libourel, T.; Leblanc, H.: A New Approach to Factorization – Introducing Metrics. Proc. of the Eight IEEE Symposium on Software Metrics (METRICS 2002), June 4-7, 2002, Ottawa, pp. 227-236
  36. Debou, C.: ami: a new paradigm for software process improvement. Proceedings of the International Conference on Pracitcal Improvement of Software Processes and Products, 4-5 May, 1994 Dublin, Ireland
  37. Debou, C.; Fuchs, N.; Saria, H.: Selling Believable Technology. IEEE Software, November 1993, pp. 22-27
  38. Debou, C.; Liptak, J.; Schippers, H.: Decision making for software process improvement: a quantitative approach. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Achieving Quality in Software (AQuIS 93), Venice, October 1993, pp 363-377
  39. Dekkers, T.: Project Improvement as Start-Up. Proc. of the PROFES 2001, Kaiserslautern, Germany, September 2001, pp. 240-254
  40. Dorenbos, D.; Combelles, A.: Key Success Factors to Enable Process Change. IEEE Software, 2004, pp. 20-21
  41. Dorling, A.: SPICE: Software Process Improvement and Capability dEtermination. Software Quality Journal, 2(1993)4, pp. 209-224
  42. Dumke, R.; R.; Blazey, M.; Hegewald, H.; Reitz, D.; Richter, K.: Causalities in Software Process Measurement and Improvement. Proc. of the MENSURA 2006, Nov. 6-8, 2006, Cardiz, Spain, pp.42-52
  43. Dumke, R.; Braungarten, R.; Blazey, M.; Hegewald, H.; Reitz, D.; Richter, K.: Structuring Software Process Metrics - A holistic semantic network based overview. Proc. of the IWSM 2006, Potsdam, Nov. 2006, pp. 483-498
  44. Dumke, R.; Richter K.; Georgieva, K.; Asfoura, E.: Process Improvement Based on Causal Networks. In: O. Ormandjieva; C. Constantinides; A. Abran; R. Lee: Eighth ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications (SERA 2010), 24-26 May 2010, Montréal, Canada, IEEE Computer Society Los Alamitos, California, S. 285-291
  45. Dustdar, S.; Guo, Y.; Satzger, B.; Truong, H.: Principles of Elastic Processes. IEEE Internet Computing, Sept./Oct. 2011, pp. 66-71
  46. Dyba, T.: Factors of Software Process Improvement Success in Small and Large Organizations: An Empirical Study in the Scandinavian Context. Software Engineering Notes, 28(2003)5, pp. 148-157
  47. Dyer, M.: The Cleanroom Approach to Quality Software Development. John Wiley & Sons, 1992
  48. Ebert, C.: Complexity measures in the software development process (German). Proceedings of the GI-Jahrestagung 1992, Berlin, pp. 189-198
  49. Ebert, C.: Experiences with Criticality Predictions in Software Developement. Software Engineering Notes, 22(1997)6, pp. 278-293
  50. Ebert, C.: Getting Started with the CMMI. IEEE Software, July/August 2004, pp. 92-94
  51. Ebert, C.: Global Software Engineering. IEEE ReadyNote (e-Book), IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, USA,
  52. Ebert, C.: Qantitative management of software process improvement. Proc. of the FESMA'98, Antwerp, Belgium, May 6-8, 1998, pp. 29-36
  53. Ebert, C.: Process Change Management in Large Organizations. Proc. of the FESMA'99, Amsterdam, Netherlands, October 1999, pp. 165-177
  54. Ebert, C.: Project and Process Measurement. In. Schmietendorf/Wille: Beiträge zum empirischen Software Engineering. Shaker-Verlag, 2012, S. 17-34
  55. Ebert, C.: Systematisches Requirements Management. dpunkt-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2005
  56. Eickelmann, N.: Measuring Maturity Goes beyond Process. IEEE Software, July/August, 2004, pp. 12-13
  57. Ejiogu, L.: Software Engineering with Software Metrics. QED Information Sciences, 1991
  58. Emam, K.E.: The Internal Consistency of the ISO/IEC 15504 Software Process Capability Scale. Proc. of the Fifth International Software Metrics Symposium, November 20-21, 1998, Bethesda, Maryland, pp. 72-81
  59. Emam, K. E.; Drouin, J. N.; Melo, W.: SPICE – The Theory and Practice of Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1998
  60. Emam, K. E.; Jung, M. W.: An empirical evaluation of the ISO/IEC 15504 assessment model. The Journal of Systems and Software, 59(2001)1, pp. 23-42
  61. Emam, K.E.; Simon, J.M.; Rousseau, S.; Jacquet, E.: Cost Implications of Interrater Agreement for Software Process Assessments. Proc. of the Fifth International Software Metrics Symposium, November 20-21, 1998, Bethesda, Maryland, pp. 38-51
  62. Erdogmus, H.; Vandergraaf, J.: Quantitative Approaches for Assessing the Value of COTS-centric Development. Proc. of the METRICS'99, Boca Raton, Florida, November 1999, pp. 279-290
  63. Ericson, T., Subotic, A., and Ursing, S.: TIM a test improvement model. J. Softw. Test., Verif. Reliab.,1998, 7(4):229–246.
  64. Escala, D.; Morision, M.: A Metrics Suite for a Team PSP. Proc. of the Fifth International Software Metrics Symposium, November 20-21, 1998, Bethesda, Maryland, pp. 89-92
  65. Everett, G. D., Raymond, and Jr., M. (2007). Software Testing: Testing Across the Entire Software Development Life Cycle. Wiley InterScience, Hobokon, NJ, USA.
  66. Fagan, M.E.: Inspecting Software Design and Code. Datamation, October 1977, pp. 133-144
  67. Farooq, A.; Georgieva, K.; Dumke, R. R.: Challenges in Evaluating SOA Test Processes. In: Dumke/Braungarten/Büren/Abran/Cuadrado-Gallego: Software Process und Product Measurement. LNCS 5338,Springer-Verlag, 2008, S. 107-11
  68. Farooq, A. and Dumke, R. R.: Research directions in verification & validation process improvement. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes,2007, 32(4):3
  69. Feiler, P.H.; Humphrey, W.S.: Software Process Development and Enactment: Concepts and Definitions. Proc. of the 2nd Int. Conf. Software Process, Los Altimos, 1993, pp. 28-40
  70. Fenton, N.; Neil, M.: Software Metrics and Risks. Proc. of the FESMA'99, Amsterdam, Netherlands, October 1999, pp. 39-55
  71. Florac, W. A.; Carleton, A. D.: Measuring the Software Process – Statistical Process Control for Software Process Improvement. Pearson Education, 1999
  72. Foucault, M. et al.: On the usefulness of ownership metrics in open-source software projects. Information and Software Technology, 64(2015)C, pp. 102-112
  73. Franke, D.W.; Purvis, M.K.: Hardware/Software CoDesign: A Perspective. Proceedings of the IEEE, 1991, pp. 344-352
  74. Fröhlich, P.; Lichter, H.; Zeller, M.: Software Process Improvement at ABB. Proc. of the CONQUEST 2001, Nuremberg, Germany, September 2001, pp. 29-40
  75. Fusaro, P.; Emam, K.E.; Smith, B.: Evaluating the Interrater Agreement of Process Capability Ratings. Proc. of the Fourth METRICS'97, Albuquerque, November 5 - 7, 1997, pp. 2-11
  76. Garmus, D., Herron, D.: Measuring the Software Process. Yourdon Press Computing Series, Prentice Hall PTR, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (1995)
  77. Gasston, J.L.; Rout, T.P.: Can the effectiveness of software processed be assessed? Software Quality Journal, 3(1994)3, pp. 153-166
  78. Gencel, C.; Buglione, L.; Abran, A.: Improvement Opportunities and Suggestions for Benchmarking. In: Abran/Braungarten/Dumke/Cuadrado-Gallego/ Brunekreef: Software Process and Product Measurement. LNCS 5891, 2009, S. 144-156
  79. Georgieva, K.: Conducting FMEA over the Software Development Process. Software Engineering Notes, Volume 35, Number 3, May 2010, ACM New York, S. 35
  80. Georgieva, K.; Dumke, R.; Neumann, R.; Farooq, A.: Software Measurement Modelling and Improvement. Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Software Engineering Research & Practice (SERP 2009), Volume II, WORLDCOMP'09,July 13-16, 2009, Las Vegas Nevada, USA, S. 396-402
  81. Georgieva, K., Neumann, R. & Dumke, R.: Applying Human Error Assessment and Reduction Technique (HEART) in the software development process. Proceedings of the joined International Conferences on Software Measurement (IWSM/MetriKon/Mensura 2010). Stuttgart Shaker Verlag Aachen.
  82. Goodman, P.: Software Process Improvement and CMM. Proc. of the ACOSM'96, Melbourne, Australia, November 19-21, 1996
  83. Grady, R.B.: Practical Software Metrics for Project Management and Process Improvement. Prentice Hall Inc., 1992
  84. Günther, D.; Dumke, R.: Security Process Integration. In: Büren et al.: Metrikon 2012 - Praxis der Software-Messung, Shaker-Verlag 2012, S. 49-52
  85. Günther, D.; Neumann, R.; Georgieva, K.; Dumke, R.R.: Causal Networks Based Process Improvement. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering & Knowledge Engineering (SEKE 2011), July 7-9, 2011, Miami Beach, Florida, USA, Printed by Knowledge Systems Institute Illinois, USA, S. 462-465, ISBN 1-891706-29-2
  86. Guerrero, F.; Eterovic, Y.: Adopting the SW-CMM in a Small IT Organization. IEEE Software, 2004, pp.29-35
  87. Guo, H.; King, G.; Ross, M.; Staples, G.: SPICE: a suitable for managing the software process in Virtual Software Environments? Proc. of the CONQUEST'99, Nuremberg, Germany, September 1999, pp. 44-52
  88. Haase, V.H.; Lebsanft, E.: Measurement of Software Process Quality: Assessment and Self-Assessment. Proc. of the ICSQ'95, Maribor, Slovenia, 6-8 Nov. 1995, pp. 9-25
  89. Hall, T.; Baddoo, N.; Wilson, D.: Measurement in Software Process Improvement Programmes: An Empirical Study. In: Dumke/Abran: New Approaches in Software Measurement, LNCS 2006, Springer Publ., 2001, pp. 73-82
  90. Hamann, D.; Pfahl, D.; Järvinen, J.; Solingen, R. van: The Role of GQM in the PROFES Improvement Methodology. Proc. of the CONQUEST'99, Nuremberg, Germany, September 1999, pp. 64-79
  91. Hayes, W.: Using a Personal Software ProcessSM to Improve Peformance. Proc. of the Fifth International Software Metrics Symposium, November 20-21, 1998, Bethesda, Maryland, pp.61-71
  92. Heires, J. T.: What I Did Last Summer: A Software Development Benchmarking Case Study. IEEE Software, September/Ocotber 2001, pp. 33-39
  93. Henderson-Sellers, B.: OO Software Process Improvement with Metrics. Proc. of the METRICS'99, Boca Raton, Florida, November 1999, pp. 2-8
  94. Hirvensalo, J.: Improving the utilisation of measurements in a software development process. Proc. of the 4th European Conference on Software Measurement and ICT Control, FESMA-DASMA 2001, May 2001, Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 247-258
  95. Humphrey, W.S.: Using A Defined and Measured Personal Software Process. IEEE Software, May 1996, pp. 77-109
  96. Ibaniez, M.; Reo, D.: Measuring the impact of software process improvement on business objectives - ESI balanced IT scorecard. Proc. of the FESMA'98, Antwerp, Belgium, May 6-8, 1998, pp. 165-174
  97. Idri, A.; Abran, A.: A Fuzzy Logic Based Set of Measures for Software Project Similarity: Validation and Possible Improvements. Pro. of the Seventh International Software Metrics Symposium METRICS 2001, April 2001, London, pp. 85-96
  98. Janus, A.; Dumke, R.R.: Auf dem Weg zu einem allgemeinen Agilen Software Entwicklungs- und Vorgehensmodell. In: G. Büren; R.R. Dumke; J. Münch: MetriKon 2011 - Praxis der Software-Messung. Tagungsband des DASMA Software Merik Kongresses, 17.-18. November 2011, Kaiserslautern, Shaker Verlag Aachen, S. 173-184, ISBN 978-3-8440-0557-8
  99. Järvinen, J.: Facilitating process assessment with tool supported maesurement programme. Proc. of the FESMA'98, Antwerp, Belgium, May 6-8, 1998, pp. 609-614
  100. Johnson, M.A.: Experience with Quality Metrics for Tracking Software Development. Proceedings of the Annual Oregon Workshop on Software Metrics, April 10-12, 1994, Silver Falls, Oregon
  101. Johnson, P. M.; Kou, H.; Paulding, M.;Zhang, Q.; Kagaw, A.; Yamashita, T.: Improving Software Development Management through Software Project Telemetry. IEEE Software, July/August 2005, pp. 78-85
  102. Jones, C.: The economics of software process improvement. IEEE Computer, January 1996, pp. 95-97
  103. Jones, C.: Variations in Software Development Practices. IEEE Software, November/December, 2003, pp. 22-27
  104. Jung, H.W.; Hunter, R.: The relationship between ISO/IEC 15504 process capability levels, ISO 9001 certification and organization size: An empirical study. The Journal of Systems and Software, 59(2001)1, pp. 43-56
  105. Karam, G.M.; Casselman, R.S.: A Cataloging Framework for Software Development Methods. IEEE Computer, February 1993, pp. 34-46
  106. Karunanithi, N.; Malaiya, Y.K.: The Scaling Problem in Neural Networks for Software Reliability Prediction. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering, Research Triangle Park, NC, October 8-9, pp. 76-82
  107. Keeni, G.: The Evolution of Quality Processes at Tata Consultancy Services. IEEE Software, July/August 2000, pp. 79-88
  108. Keil, M.; Cule, P.E.; Lyytinen, K.; Schmidt, R.C.: A Framework for Identifying Software Project Risks. Comm. of the ACM, 41(1998)11, pp. 76-83
  109. Kennet, R. S.; Baker, E. R.: Software Process Quality - Management and Control. Marcel Dekker Inc. Publ., 1999
  110. Kitchenham, B. A.: Software Metrics – Measurement for Software Process Improvement. NCC Blackwell Ltd, 1996
  111. Kitchenham, B.A.; Littlewood, B.: Measurement for Software Control and Assurance. Elsevier Science Publisher Ltd, 1989
  112. Khoshgoftaar, T.M.; Lanning, D.L.: An Neural Network Approach for Early Detection of Program Modules having High Risk in the Maintenance Phase Proceedings of the Annual Oregon Workshop on Software Metrics, April 10-12, 1994, Silver Falls, Oregon
  113. Khoshgoftaar, T.M.; Lanning, D.L.: Improving Development Process Feedback by Considering Software Product Simularity. Proc. of the AOWSM, June 5-7, 1995, Oregon, Section 12
  114. Kirsopp, C.: Measurement and the software development process. Proc. of the ESCOM 2001, April 2001, London, pp. 165-173
  115. Koomen, T. and Pol, M. (1999). Test Process Improvement: a Practical Step-by-Step Guide to Structured Testing. Addison-Wesley, New York, NY, USA.
  116. Kugler, H.: Process Improvement: How Much Can the Organisation Endure?. Proceedings of the International Conference on Pracitcal Improvement of Software Processes and Products, 4-5 May, 1994, Dublin, Ireland
  117. Kunz, M.; Braungarten, R.; Dumke, R.: Bewertungsansätze und Modelle für unternehmensweite Software-Messinitiativen. ASQT 2006, Klagenfurt, 14.-15. September 2006
  118. Kusters, R. J.; Trienekens, J. J. M.; Hassoldt, W.: On the business impact of SPI. Proc. of the ESCOM-SCOPE 2000, April 2000, Munich, Germany, Shaker Publ., pp. 191-199
  119. Kuvaja, P.; Bicego, A.: BOOTSTRAP - a European assessment methodology. Software Quality Journal, 3(1994)3, pp. 117-127
  120. Lami, G.; Fabbrini, F.; Buglione, L.: An ISO/IEC 33000-Compliant Measurement Framework for Software Process Sustainability Assessment. Joint Conference of the International Workshop on Software Measurement and the International Conference on Software Process and Product Measurement (IWSM-MENSURA), 2014, pp. 50-59
  121. Lavazza, L.: Peroviding Automated Support for the GQM Measurement Process. IEEE Software, May/June 2000, pp. 56-62
  122. Lawrence, M.J.: Programming Methodology, Organizational Environment, and Programming Productivity. The Journal of Systems and Software, 2 (1981), pp. 257-269
  123. Layman, B.; Wietstock, S.: Measurement maturity and the SW-CMM. Proc. of the 4th European Conference on Software Measurement and ICT Control, FESMA-DASMA 2001, May 2001, Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 101-116
  124. Lebsanft, K.: Process Improvement in Turbulent Times: Is CMM Still an Answer? Proc. of the PROFES 2001, Kaiserslautern, Germany, September 2001, pp. 78-85
  125. Lebsanft, K.; Rheindt, M.: EFQM, Balanced Scorecards, CMM and Metrics - How do These fit Together. Proc. of the FESMA'99, Amsterdam, Netherlands, October 1999, pp. 427-433
  126. Lee, I.; Iyer, R.K.; Analysis of Software Halts in the Tandem GUARDIAN Operating System. Proceedings of the Thrid International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering, Research Triangle Park, NC, October 8-9, pp. 227-236
  127. Lehman, M.M.: Laws of Software Evolution Revisited. EWSTP96, October, LNCS 1149, Spinger Verlag, 1997, pp 108-124
  128. Lehman, M.M.; Perry, D.E.; Turski, W.M.: Metrics and Laws of Software Evolution - The Nineties View. Proc. of the Fourth METRICS'97, Albuquerque, Nov. 5-7, 1997, pp. 20-32
  129. Leszak, M.: Practical Product and Process Measurement - Lessons Learned from 6 Years of Experience. In: Dumke, R. (Hrsg.): Software-Metriken in der Praxis, Shaker-Verlag, Aachen, 2001, S. 75-101
  130. Little, T.: Value Creation and Capture: A Model of the Software Development Process. IEEE Software, May/June, 2004, pp. 48-53
  131. Locke, D.: The benefits of comparative analysis: measurement based software process improvement. Proc. of the FESMA'98, Antwerp, Belgium, May 6-8, 1998, pp. 145-156
  132. Lott, C.M.: Process and measurement support in SEEs. Software Engineering Notes, 18(1993)4, pp. 83-93
  133. Manzoni, L. V.; Price, R. T.: Identifying Extensions Required by RUP (Rational Unified Process) to Comply with CMM (Capability Maturity Model) Levels 2 and 3. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 29(2003)2, pp. 181-192
  134. Massoud, A.: Quality-Based Issues in SOA Migration. Software Measurement News, 20(2015)1, pp. 19-52
  135. Matsubara, T.: Process Certification: A Double-Edge Sword. IEEE Software, November/December 2000, pp. 104-105
  136. Mayrhauser, A.: Software Engineering. Academic Press, Inc. Boston New York, 1990
  137. McCracken, B.: Taking Control of IT Performance. InfoServer LLC, Dallas, Texas, October, 2002
  138. McGarry, F.; Burke, S.; Decker, B.: Measuring the Impacts Individual Process Maturity Attributes Have on Software Products. Proc. of the Fifth International Software Metrics Symposium, November 20-21, 1998, Bethesda, Maryland, pp. 52-60
  139. McGarry, J. et al.: Practical Software Measurement – Objective Information for Decision Making. Addison Wesley Publ., 2002
  140. McGarry, F.; Decker, B.: Attaining Level 5 in CMM Process Maturity. IEEE Software, November/December 2002, pp. 87-96
  141. Messnarz, R.; Kugler, H.; Haase, V.: BOOTSTRAP and ISO 9000: A Quantitative Approach to Objective Quality Management. Proceedings of the International Conference on Practical Imrpovement of Software Processes and Products, 4-5 May, 1994, Dublin, Ireland
  142. Mills, H.D.; Basili, V.R.; Gannon, J.D.; Hamlet, R.G.: Mathematical Priniciples for a First Course in Software Engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 15(1989)5, pp. 550-559
  143. Mills, H.D.; Dyson, P.B.: Using Metrics Quantify Development. IEEE Software, March 1990, pp. 14-16
  144. Mittelmann, A.: Messen von weichen Faktoren - Ein Erfahrungsbericht. in: Dumke/Lehner: Software-Metriken, DUV, 2000, (ISBN 3-8244-7120-5), pp. 221-229
  145. Moeller, K.-H.: Metric application in the software development. (German). HMD, (1992) 163, pp. 17-30
  146. Mitchell, R.J.: Managing Complexity in Software Engineering. IEEE Computing Series 17, London, 1990
  147. Möller, K. H.; Paulish, D. J.: Software Metrics – A Practitioner’s Guide to Improved Product Development. Chapman Hall, London, 1993
  148. Morell, L.; Murrill, B.: Semantic Metrics through Error Flow Analysis. The Journal of Systems and Software, 20(1993)3, pp. 253-265
  149. Morisio, M.; Romano, D.; Moiso, C.: Framework Based Software Development: Investigating the Learning Effect. Proc. of the METRICS'99, Boca Raton, Florida, November 1999, pp. 260-268
  150. Mutafelija, B.; Stromberg, H.: Systematic Process Improvement Using ISO 9001-2000 and CMMI. Artech House, Boston, 2003
  151. Myers W.: A Statistical Approach to Scheduling Software Development . Second Edition to Selected Reprints in Software, IEEE Computer Society, Spring, 1982, pp. 105-117
  152. Myrtveit, I.; Stensrud, E.; Olsson, U.: Assessing the Benefits of Imputing ERP Projects with Missing Data. Pro. of the Seventh International Software Metrics Symposium METRICS 2001, April 2001, London, pp. 78-84
  153. Natale, D.: On the Impact Metrics' Application in a Large Scale Software Maintenance Environment. Proceedings of the Conference on Software Maintenance 1991, Sorrento, Italy, October 15-17, pp. 114-118
  154. Nesi, P.: Managing OO Projects Better. IEEE Software, July/August, 1998, pp. 50-60
  155. O'Connor, R.; Coleman, G.: Individual Software Process Improvement - Does Europe Need It? Proc. of the ESCOM 2001, April 2001, London, pp. 305-314
  156. Nikora, A. P.; Munson, J. C.: An approach to the measurement of software evolution: Research Articles. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice, 17(2005)1, pp. 65-91
  157. Olsen, N.C.: The Software Rush Hour. IEEE Software, September 1993, pp. 29-37
  158. Orci, T.: Software Process Improvement or Measurement Programme - Which One Comes First? Proc. of the FESMA'99, Amsterdam, Netherlands, October 1999, pp. 127-140
  159. Pandelios, G, Rumsey, T & Dorofee, A.: Using Risk Management for Software Process Improvement. SEPG Conference, Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburg, 1996
  160. Paulish, D.J.; Carleton, A.D.: Case Studies of Software Process Improvement Measurement. IEEE Computer, September 1994, pp. 50-57
  161. Paulk, M.C.: Comparing ISO 9001 and the Capability Maturity Model for Software. Software Quality Journal, 2(1993)4, pp. 245-256
  162. Paulk, M.C.: The Capability Maturity Model: A Tutorial. Tutorial on the Second International Conference on Software Quality, Research Triangle Park, NC, October 1992
  163. Petersen, K.; Wohlin, C.: Software process improvement through the Lean Measurement (SPI-LEAM) method. Journal of Systems and Software, 83(2010)7, pp. 1275-1287
  164. Pfahl, D.; Lebsanft, K.: Using Simulation to Analyse the Impact of Software Requirement Volatility on Project Performance. Proc. of the ESCOM-SCOPE 2000, April 2000, Munich, Germany, Shaker Publ., pp. 267-275
  165. Pfleeger, S.L.; Rombach, H.D.: Measurement Based Process Improvement. IEEE Software, July 1994, pp. 9-11
  166. Plekhanova, V.: Capability and Compatibility Measurement in Software Process Improvement. Proc. of the FESMA'99, Amsterdam, Netherlands, October 1999, pp. 179-188
  167. Pressman, R.S.: Software Engineering - A Practioner's Approach. McGraw-Hill Int., 1987
  168. Punter, T.: Software Measurement with GQM-Light Tagungsband des DASMA Software Metrik Kongresses (MetriKon 2003), November 10-11, 2003, Ulm, Shaker Publ., Aachen, pp. 35-44
  169. Putnam, L.H.: Measures for Excellence. Unicom Publisher, 1992
  170. Ramamoorthy, C.V.; Garg, V.; Prakash, A.: Programming in the Large. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 12(1986)7, pp. 769-783
  171. Ramamoorthy, C.V.; Prakash, A.; Tsai, W.; Usuda, Y.: Software Engineering: Problems and Perspectives. IEEE Computer, Oct. 1984, pp. 191-209
  172. Ravichandran, S.; Shareef, P. M.: Software Process Assessment Through Metrics Models. Proc. of the ESCOM 2001, April 2001, London, pp. 367-376
  173. Reo, D. A.; Quintano, N.; Buglione, L.: Measuring Software Process Improvement: There's More to it Than Just Measuring Processes! Proc. of the FESMA'99, Amsterdam, Netherlands, October 1999, pp. 391-402
  174. Richter, K.: Causal-Based Networks Supported Process Improvement. Software Engineering Notes, 34(2009)9, p. 32
  175. Richter, K.: Kausalitätsbasierte Modellierung von Software-Entwicklungsprozessen. Softwaretechnik-Trends, Band 28, Heft 4, November 2008, S. 12-17
  176. Rico, D. F.: ROI of Software Process Improvement: Metrics for Project Managers and Software Engineers. J. Ross Publishing, Inc, 2004
  177. Rozman, I. et al.: PROCESSUS - Assessment and Improvement of Software Process Quality. Proc. of the ICSQ'95, Maribor, Slovenia, 6-8 Nov. 1995, pp. 19-25
  178. Rubin, H.A.: Software Process Maturity: Measuring its Impact on Productivity and Quality. Proceedings of the First International Software Metrics Symposium, Baltimore, May 21-22, 1993, pp. 2-10
  179. Rudisill, D.: QCASE - A New Paradigm For Computer Aided Software Engineering. Proceedings of the International Software Quality Exchange, San Francisco, March 10-11, 1992
  180. Satpathy, M.; Harrison, R.; Snook, C.; Butler, M.: A Generic Model for Assessing Process Quality. In: Dumke/Abran: New Approaches in Software Measurement, LNCS 2006, Springer Publ., 2001, pp. 94-110
  181. Schmietendorf, A.; End, A.; Dumke R.: Prognoseverfahren zur Bewertung der Prozessperformance und der Prozesskosten. In: G. Büren und R.R. Dumke: Praxis der Software-Messung - Tagungsband des DASMA Software Metrik Kongresses (MetriKon 2009), 19.-20. November, 2009, Kaiserslautern, Shaker Verlag Aachen, S. 305-318
  182. Schmietendorf, A.; Wille, C.: Beiträge zum empirischen Software Engineering - eine Bilanz. Shaker-Verlag, Aachen, 2012
  183. Schneider, K.; Gantner, T.: Zwei Anwendungen von GQM: Ähnlich, aber doch nicht gleich Tagungsband des DASMA Software Metrik Kongresses (MetriKon 2003), November 10-11, 2003, Ulm, Shaker Publ., Aachen, pp. 19-34
  184. Schneider, K.; Hunnius, J.; Basili, V. R.: Experience in Implementing a Learning Software Organisation. IEEE Software, May/June 2002, pp. 46-49
  185. Selby, R.W.: Interconnectivity Analysis Techniques for Error Localization in Large Systems. The Journal of Systems and Sofwtare, 20(1993)3, pp. 267-294
  186. Sharma, S.; Rai, A.: CASE Deployment in IS Organizations. Comm. of the ACM, pp.80-88
  187. Shepperd, M.: Software Engineering Metrics.Vol. I and II, McGraw-Hill, 1993/94
  188. Shneiderman, B.: Software Psychology. Winthrop Publishers Inc., Massachusetts, 1980
  189. Slovin, M.; Nunno, D.D.: Engineering the Entreprise: Envolving Quality Systems. ACM SIGSOFT Notes, July 1994, pp. 45-47
  190. ] Sneed, H. M.: Software Projektkalkulation. Hanser-Verlag München, 2005
  191. Solingen, R. van: Measuring the ROI of Software Process Improvement. IEEE Software, May/June, 2004, pp. 32-38
  192. Stahlknecht, P.: The application of mathematics to the software development (german). Angewandte Informatik, 24(1982)2, pp. 115-125
  193. Stienen, H.: Nach CMM und BOOTSTRAP: SPICE. Proc. of the CONQUEST'99, Nuremberg, Germany, September 1999, pp. 34-43
  194. Suwannasart, T. and Srichaivattana, P.: A set of measurements to improve software testing process. In NCSEC’99: Proceedings of the 3rd National Computer Science and Engineering Conference, 1999
  195. Suonsyrjä S., Hokkanen L., Terho H., Systä K., and Mikkonen T.: Post-Deployment Data: A Recipe for Satisfying Knowledge Needs in Software Development? Heidrich, J.; Vogelezang, F. (Eds.): IWSM/Mensura 2016, IEEE Computer Society, CPS, pp. 139-147
  196. Thomas, G. C.; Smith, H. R.: Using Structured Benchmarking to Fast-Track CMM Process Improvement. IEEE Software, September/October 2001, pp. 48-52
  197. Thaller, G. E.: Qualitätsoptimierung der Software-Entwicklung - Das Capability Maturity Model (CMM). Vieweg Verlag, Braunschweig Wiesbaden, 1993
  198. Tiwana, A.: Beyond the Black Box: Knowledge Overlaps in Software Outsourcing. IEEE Software, September/October 2004, pp. 51-58
  199. Torii, K.; Matsumoto, K.: Quantitative analytic approaches in software engineering. Information and Software Technology, 38(1996), pp. 155-163
  200. Tsui, F.; Hofmann, S.C.; Goldstrohm, W.J.: A software development post-mortem summary. Software Engineering Journal, July 1992, pp. 277-284
  201. Walther, R.: Qualitätsbezogene Prozessbewertung am Beispiel eines Entwicklungs- und Wartungsprozesses im E-Procurement Sektor. Diploma Thesis, University of Magdeburg, Germany, 2005
  202. Wilkinson, S.J.: Deploying Software Metrics in a Large Organisation. Proceedings of the Annual Oregon Workshop on Software Metrics, April 10-12, Silver Falls, Oregon
  203. Wohlin, C.; Höst, M.; Regnell, B.: Organisational learning from software project success. Proc. of the ESCOM-SCOPE 2000, April 2000, Munich, Germany, Shaker Publ., pp. 3-11
  204. Zahran, S.: Software Process Improvement – A Practical Guidelines for Business Success. Addison-Wesley Verlag, 1997
  205. Zhiying, Z.: CMM in Uncertain Environments. Comm. of the ACM, 46(2003)8, pp. 115-119